Showing posts with label effects. Show all posts
Showing posts with label effects. Show all posts

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

Neuropathy Just One Of The Statins Side Effects


Today's post from articles.mercola.com (see link below) looks at the risks of taking statins for people with nerve problems amongst other things. Statins are a very fast growing market in a world where heart attacks and strokes plus high cholesterol, are increasing medical issues thanks mainly to modern life-styles. They will work very effectively to reduce cholesterol and thus prevent a whole array of problems but they do have their side effects and many people just aren't aware of the risks they run when taking statins. This especially applies to neuropathy patients and people at risk of nerve damage. Statins can unfortunately bring on nerve damage, or make it considerably worse and as we all know, that's the last thing we want. It's important that if your doctor suggests taking statins that you bring up the subject of potential nerve damage yourself. It needs to be discussed.


The Ugly Side of Statins: Systemic Appraisal of the Contemporary Unknown Unknowns
By Dr. Mercola October 09, 2013


Statin cholesterol-lowering drugs are among the most widely prescribed drugs on the market, bringing in $20 billion a year.1 They are a top profit-maker for the pharmaceutical industry, in part due to relentless and highly successful direct-to-consumer advertising campaigns.

One in four Americans over the age of 45 now takes statins, typically for the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes. Traditionally, primary prevention usually involves healthy lifestyle choices that support heart health, things like eating right and exercising, yet here we have millions of Americans taking pills instead.

Has anyone unbiased stopped to find out if these drugs are really the best method for heart attack prevention? After all, as researchers noted in the Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases (OJEMD):2

“…naive indiscriminate acceptance of novel mainstream therapies is not always advisable and prudence is required in unearthing harmful, covert side effects.”

This is precisely the task that researchers from Ireland took on by completing an objective review of Pubmed, EM-BASE and Cochrane review databases.3 Their results speak volumes…


“It is beginning to dawn on some clinicians that contemporary treatments are not only failing to impact on our most prevalent diseases, but they may be causing more damage than good. A perfect example of such an issue is the statin saga.” 


The Evidence Is In: Lifestyle Trumps Statins for Primary Heart Attack Prevention


For a drug therapy that appears to offer little by way of primary prevention, the risks were alarming. For every 10,000 people taking a statin, there were:
307 extra patients with cataracts
23 additional patients with acute kidney failure
74 extra patients with liver dysfunction

The landmark review revealed “a categorical lack of clinical evidence to support the use of statin therapy in primary prevention.” They also found that statins actually increase cardiovascular risk in women, the young and people with diabetes. The review also showed that statin therapy increased:
Muscle fatigabilty by 30% with more than 11% incidence of rhabdomyolysis (a life-threatening muscle condition) at high doses
Coronary artery and aortic calcification
Erectile dysfunction, which is 10 times more common in young men taking the lowest dose of statin.
Diabetes
Cancer

The researchers noted:

“There is increased risk of diabetes mellitus, cataract formation, and erectile dysfunction in young statin users, all of which are alarming. Furthermore there is a significant increase in the risk of cancer and neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly plus an enhanced risk of a myriad of infectious diseases. All side effects are dose dependent and persist during treatment.

Primary prevention clinical results provoke the possibility of not only the lack of primary cardiovascular protection by statin therapy, but highlight the very real possibility of augmented cardiovascular risk in women, patients with diabetes mellitus and the young. Statins are associated with triple the risk of coronary artery and aortic calcification.

These findings on statins' major adverse effects had been under-reported and the way in which they [were] withheld from the public, and even concealed, is a scientific farce.

… Cardiovascular primary prevention and regeneration programmes, through life style changes and abstaining from tobacco use have enhanced clinical efficacy and quality of life over any pharmaceutical or other conventional intervention.” 


If You Take Statins, Your Vision Could Be at Risk

The featured review found an increased risk of cataracts with statin use, and this was supported by a new JAMA study,4 which further revealed that the risk of cataracts is increased among statin users, compared with non-users. As a main cause of low vision among the elderly, cataract is a clouding of your eye lens.

It has previously been hypothesized that statin antioxidant effects may slow the aging process of the lens, but the current study revealed that they, instead, raise cataract risk, again calling into question the usefulness of statins for primary prevention of heart attacks. The researchers concluded:

“The risk-benefit ratio of statin use, specifically for primary prevention, should be carefully weighed, and further studies are warranted.” 


Certain Statins May Impair Your Memory and May Even Lead to Amnesia

Still more research revealed that rats taking the statin Pravachol (pravastatin) had impaired learning, with lower abilities to perform simple learning and memory tasks.5 This isn’t exactly news, as in 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it would be requiring additional warning labels for statins, one of which warned that statins may increase the risk of memory loss and confusion. The warnings, particularly the one for memory loss, came as the result of anecdotal reports compiled over the previous year…

Interestingly, the animal study found no association between another statin drug, Lipitor, and impaired memory in the rats. But Dr. Duane Graveline, a medical doctor and former astronaut, has written an entire book on this very topic, titled Lipitor: Thief of Memory.

In my interview with him, Dr. Graveline shared his powerful story about how Lipitor caused him severe global transient amnesia, which is what brought him out of retirement to investigate statins. There have been thousands of cases of transient global amnesia and other types of cognitive damage associated with statin use, reported to the FDA’s MedWatch site. It is believed that statin drugs damage your brain by creating a cholesterol deficiency.

Insufficient cholesterol results in your brain not having the raw materials it needs to make biochemicals critical for memory and cognitive function, including coenzyme Q10 and dolichols, the latter of which carry the genetic instructions from your DNA to help create specific proteins in your body that are crucial for cognitive function, emotions and mood.
High Cholesterol Levels May Be Protective

Any discussion of statins would be incomplete without a discussion of cholesterol – the ‘villain’ that these drugs mercilessly lower. Many buy into the conventional belief that lower cholesterol equals a lower risk of heart disease, but this is not always the case. And, in fact, high cholesterol levels are indeed protective in some cases, whereas low cholesterol levels are very clearly linked to chronic disease. Writing in OJEMD, researchers explained:

“Cholesterol is crucial for energy, immunity, fat metabolism, leptin, thyroid hormone activity, liver related synthesis, stress intolerance, adrenal function, sex hormone syntheses and brain function. When prescribing HMGCoA reductase inhibitors [statins] one needs to be cognizant of the fact that the body had increased its’ cholesterol as a compensatory mechanism and investigate accordingly.

We seem to have fallen into the marketing trap and ignored the niggling side effects with regard to the HMGCoA reductase inhibitors. The only statin benefit that has actually been demonstrated is in middle-aged men with coronary heart disease. However, statins were not shown to best form of primary prevention.

… In actual fact, high cholesterol levels have been found to be protective in elderly and heart failure patients and hypo-cholestereamic [low cholesterol] patients had higher incidence of intra-cerebral bleeds, depression and cancer. … We are observing the revealing of the utmost medical tragedy of all time. It is unprecedented that the healthcare industry has inadvertently induced life-threatening nutrient deficiency in millions of otherwise healthy people. What is even more disparaging is that not only has there been a failure to report on these negative side-effects of statins, there has actually been active discouragement to publish any negative studies on statins.”

This is, in large part, why so many people are completely unaware that statin drugs have been directly linked to over 300 side effects,6 which include:

Cognitive loss Neuropathy Anemia
Acidosis Frequent fevers Cataracts
Sexual dysfunction An increase in cancer risk Pancreatic dysfunction
Immune system suppression Muscle problems, polyneuropathy (nerve damage in the hands and feet), and rhabdomyolysis, a serious degenerative muscle tissue condition Hepatic dysfunction. (Due to the potential increase in liver enzymes, patients must be monitored for normal liver function)

Ask Yourself – and Your informed Physician -- if You Really Need to Be Taking Statins

I've long stated that the odds are very high -- greater than 100 to 1 -- that if you're taking a statin, you may not even need it, as cholesterol is NOT the cause of heart disease. To further reinforce the importance of cholesterol, I want to remind you of the work of Dr. Stephanie Seneff, who works with the Weston A. Price Foundation.

One of her theories is that cholesterol combines with sulfur to form cholesterol sulfate, and that this cholesterol sulfate helps thin your blood by serving as a reservoir for the electron donations you receive when walking barefoot on the Earth (also called grounding). She believes that, via this blood-thinning mechanism, cholesterol sulfate may provide natural protection against heart disease.

In fact, she goes so far as to hypothesize that heart disease is likely the result of cholesterol deficiency — which of course is the complete opposite of the conventional view. So if your physician is urging you to check your total cholesterol, know that this test will tell you virtually nothing about your risk of heart disease, unless it is 330 or higher. HDL percentage is a far more potent indicator for heart disease risk. Here are the two ratios you should pay attention to:
HDL/Total Cholesterol Ratio: Should ideally be above 24 percent. If below 10 percent, you have a significantly elevated risk for heart disease.
Triglyceride/HDL Ratio: Should be below 2.

Additional risk factors for heart disease include: 


Your fasting insulin level: Any meal or snack high in carbohydrates like fructose and refined grains generates a rapid rise in blood glucose and then insulin to compensate for the rise in blood sugar. The insulin released from eating too many carbs promotes fat production and makes it more difficult for your body to shed excess weight, and excess fat, particularly around your belly, is one of the major contributors to heart disease
Your fasting blood sugar level: Studies have shown that people with a fasting blood sugar level of 100-125 mg/dl had a nearly 300 percent increase higher risk of having coronary heart disease than people with a level below 79 mg/dl
Your iron level: Iron can be a very potent oxidative stress, so if you have excess iron levels you can damage your blood vessels and increase your risk of heart disease. Ideally, you should monitor your ferritin levels and make sure they are not much above 80 ng/ml. The simplest way to lower them if they are elevated is to donate your blood. If that is not possible you can have a therapeutic phlebotomy and that will effectively eliminate the excess iron from your body 


Try This Instead for Primary Heart Attack Prevention


Make no mistake about it, statin drugs are some of the most side effect-ridden medications on the market, and they frequently do more harm than good. Of utmost importance, statins deplete your body of CoQ10, which accounts for many of its devastating results. Therefore, if you take a statin, you MUST take supplemental CoQ10, or better, the reduced form called ubiquinol. If you are interested in optimizing your cholesterol levels (which doesn't necessarily mean lowering them) and lowering your risk of heart disease and heart attacks, there are natural strategies available for doing so.
Reduce, with the plan of eliminating, grains and sugars in your diet, replacing them with mostly whole, fresh vegetable carbs and healthy fats. Also try to consume a good portion of your food raw.
Make sure you are getting enough high-quality, animal-based omega-3 fats, such as krill oil.
Other heart-healthy foods include olive oil, coconut and coconut oil, organic raw dairy products and eggs, avocados, raw nuts and seeds, and organic grass-fed meats.
Optimize your vitamin D levels.
Exercise daily, especially with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercises.
Avoid smoking or drinking alcohol excessively.
Be sure to get plenty of good, restorative sleep. 



Sources and References

Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases 2013, Vol. 3, No. 3
JAMA Ophthalmology September 19, 2013
Medical News Today September 26, 2013
PLoS ONE 8(9): e75467.

1 Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases 2013, Vol. 3, No. 3
2 See ref 1
3 See ref 1
4 JAMA Ophthalmology September 19, 2013
5 PLoS ONE 8(9): e75467.
6 GreenMedInfo Statin Drugs 

 
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/10/09/statin-cholesterol-lowering-drugs.aspx

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Cymbalta a treatment for pain or the psychological effects of pain


(...Treatments 3)
Using antidepressants to treat neuropathic pain is becoming a more common treatment method maybe because it's a no-brainer for the doctors. If your pain is chronic, it stands to reason that you will become depressed, to whatever degree and many doctors subscribe to the theory that pain is partially psychosomatic anyway. The problem is that coming off these drugs, whenever that is appropriate, is not always easy, thus creating another problem on top of the neuropathy. Cymbalta is an example of that and many HIV patients have clutched at the offered straw, believing that if it helps with the pain and with the psyche, it's a win-win situation, until they try to stop taking it. If you've been advised to use Cymbalta or another of the antidepressants, ask your doctor two things: will I be able to come off it gradually and will you monitor that and does it clash with anything else that I am taking?


Cymbalta (duloxetine)
An Antidepressant That Also Relieves Nerve Pain
From Mark Cichocki, R.N., former About.com Guide


What is Cymbalta?
Cymbalta (duloxetine) is an antidepressant recently approved by the FDA that has also been approved to treat peripheral neuropathy. People who suffer from depression will often experience pain; people with depression are more sensitive to pain, and treating depression improves one’s threshold for pain. Cymbalta not only treats the emotional effects of depression, but the physical pain of depression as well.

How Does Cymbalta Work?
To understand how Cymbalta works, you must first understand the physiology or cause of depression. There are two naturally occurring chemicals in the brain that are responsible for mood and mood stability. Under normal circumstances, these two chemicals, serotonin and norepinephrine, are in a specific balance. However, these chemicals can become out of balance, causing changes in mood, specifically depression. Cymbalta works by re-establishing the balance of these two chemicals, and in turn relieving the symptoms of depression.
The same two chemicals responsible for mood also have an influence on pain perception. Just as an imbalance causes depression, an imbalance of these chemicals causes pain. When Cymbalta re-establish chemical balance, the symptoms of pain are relieved.

Important Note! - While Cymbalta relieves nerve pain, keep in mind it is not a narcotic.

How is Cymbalta Prescribed and Taken?
Cymbalta is available in 20mg, 30mg, and 60mg capsules. The preferred dose is 60mg once daily. Some people may require less than 60mg each day. As is the case in any medication, the prescribed dose should be the lowest does that has therapeutic effect.
One benefit of Cymbalta is the fact it can be taken as one capsule once per day. Adherence to HIV medications is an ongoing problem in the treatment of HIV. Two factors that impact adherence is the number of pills that must be taken each day and how often medicine needs to be taken in a day. Most antidepressants can be taken once per day, however, current peripheral neuropathy medications often have to be taken several times each day. Cymbalta's one capsule, once-a-day treatment does not add significantly to a daily pill burden.

What Should I Expect When Taking Cymbalta?
Like most antidepressants, it will take some time before you feel the effects of Cymbalta. It takes some time to re-establish a chemical balance in the brain. Some people will feel better after about a week on the drug and most will feel better by four to five weeks after starting. You should not stop the drug until speaking with your physician.
Important Note! - Unlike narcotic pain medications that work an hour after taking a dose, Cymbalta will take a little time to relieve your pain. If you need pain control while serotonin and norepinephrine balance is restored, speak to your doctor for suggestions.


Are There Any Side Effects I Should Be Aware Of?
Like most medications, there are some side effects associated with Cymbalta. Most side effects - if they do occur - will resolve after the body becomes adjusted to the medication, usually in a couple of weeks. In clinical trials, the most commonly reported side effects include:•nausea
•dry mouth
•constipation
•decreased appetite
•fatigue
•drowsiness or feeling sleepy
•increased sweating
•sexual side-effects
•possible withdrawal symptoms if abruptly discontinued
While not common, there have been reported cases of elevated blood pressure when taking Cymbalta. Your doctor will monitor your blood pressure while taking the drug.

Drug Interactions and Precautions
While Cymbalta has been deemed safe by the FDA, there are people who should not take the drug because of certain drug interactions. Some drugs, when taken together can cause unpredictable and potentially dangerous side effects. For that reason, you should not take Cymbalta if:•you have had an allergic reaction to Cymbalta in the past
•you have taken drugs known as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) - consult your doctor or pharmacist if you are taking an MAOI drug
•you have glaucoma
•you are taking the drug Mellaril (thioridazine).


Tuesday, 26 July 2016

HIV And Its Medications Possible Side Effects


Today's useful post from aidsinfonet.org (see link below) is aimed at people living with the side effects of HIV and its medications, including neuropathy (which is a significant and underestimated consequence of HIV for roughly a third of all positive people).
The post lists the main side effects people living with HIV may have to deal with and provides links to more information on each one. Those who imagine that being HIV+ these days is just a matter of taking one pill a day and living a normal lifespan, may want to think again in light of these potential problems. Those with both HIV and neuropathy already understand that very well.


Side Effects and Their Treatment
July 27, 2013

To see a list of fact sheets in each category, click on the category name.

NOTE: You can see a full list of fact sheet topics on Fact Sheet 1000.

Treatments for Side Effects

550. Side Effects

A discussion of the most common side effects of antiretroviral treatment, with links to other fact sheets for more information. Includes fatigue, anemia, digestive problems, lipodystrophy, peripheral neuropathy, mitochondrial toxicity, and osteoporosis.

[Reviewed August 12, 2012]

551. Fatigue

A description of fatigue among people with HIV, its causes and treatment.

[Reviewed April 10, 2013]

552. Anemia

A description of anemia among people with HIV, its causes and treatment.

[Reviewed June 18, 2013]

553. Body Shape Changes (Lipodystrophy)

A description of lipodystrophy (changes in metabolism and body shape) in people with HIV, its risks, suspected causes and treatment.

[Reviewed November 14, 2012]

554. Diarrhea

A description of diarrhea in people with HIV, its causes and treatment.

[Revised December 31, 2012]

555. Peripheral Neuropathy

A description of peripheral neuropathy in people with HIV, its causes and treatment.

[Revised December 19, 2012]

556. Mitochondrial Toxicity

A description of mitochondrial toxicity in people with HIV, its causes and treatment.

[Reviewed August 13, 2012]

557. Osteoporosis

A discussion of loss of bone mineral density associated with HIV and its treatment, including osteoporosis

[Revised June 2, 2013]

558. Depression and HIV

Depression is common in HIV

[Revised July 29, 2012]

559. Osteonecrosis

Definition and description of osteonecrosis (bone death) in HIV

[Reviewed August 13, 2012]

http://www.aidsinfonet.org/categories/view/17

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Antibiotic Side Effects Include Neuropathy Vid


Today's post from click2houston.com (see link below) is a video with transcript of a news report on fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as Cipro and Levaquin (amongst others). The warning is clear and has been highlighted several times on this blog, yet these antibiotics are still routinely issued in their millions every day across the world. Be warned; if you're susceptible to, or already have neuropathic symptoms, it may be best to stay well clear of these antibiotics. At the very least, a serious discussion with your doctor may be necessary - there are always alternatives.


Thousands of adverse reactions reported from common antibiotics
Patients claim they were not properly warned of side effects from Levaquin, Ciprofloxacin

Author: Haley Hernandez, Reporter Published On: Apr 13 2015




video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

HOUSTON - Less than a year ago, David Crain, a healthy and vibrant 33-year-old musician and personal trainer, was in the prime of his life. “I was running 6 miles in the August heat with my shirt off, screaming, yelling, listening to music effortlessly,” he said. Now, he can barely play his guitar.

Just about all I can do. It's hurting. If I do it now, I'll pay for it later,” Crain said.

Last June Crain went to the emergency room for what doctors believed was colitis. He was prescribed the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin, a generic form of Bayer’s Cipro, and began taking the recommended dosage.

“I think around about day seven or day eight, I just noticed like every time I would stand up I’d just be super-fatigued,” Crain said. “My ears rang all the time, I had trouble walking in the second month. My shoulders hurt, my tendons hurt.”

Tammy Renzi was prescribed the antibiotic Levaquin for a sinus infection. Six days into her 10-day dosage, she said she knew something wasn't right.

“I had a heaviness in my thighs. I had pressure in my lower spine. My vertebrae felt like they were rubbing on each other and I could hear the snapping in them,” Renzi said.

Both Crain and Renzi are not alone. From November 1997 to May 2011, more than 85,000 adverse reactions to Levaquin were reported to the Food and Drug Administration, including 1,174 deaths.

More than 67,000 adverse reactions to Cipro were also reported, including 1,257 deaths.

Dr. Charles Bennett, state chair of Medication Safety at the University of South Carolina, has been tracking the issue. He said Crain and Renzi's reactions may be caused by a mysterious genetic predisposition.

“Research should be done to identify those genetic factors,” Bennett said. “You certainly wouldn't want to take a drug if you knew you had a genetic predisposition to its side effects.”

Until that research is done, Bennett has petitioned the FDA, requesting stronger warnings.

“The current insert has a black box warning for tendon rupture and neurologic damage. It needs to be beyond the package insert,” he said.

Channel 2 Investigates reached out to both drug manufacturers.

According to Bayer Corporation, the FDA issued a drug safety communication requiring that "the drug labels and medication guides for all fluoroquinolone antibacterial drugs be updated to better describe the serious side effect of peripheral neuropathy."

Johnson & Johnson, Levaquin’s parent company, wrote, “Since 2004, the Levaquin label has informed physicians and patients about possible side effects related to peripheral neuropathy.”

Crain and Renzi said they want everyone to know the risks so that they don't end up with the same fate.

“I wouldn't take it again if my life depended on it,” Renzi said.

“My biggest fear is that I’m, you know, my son is never going to know who I was,” Crain said.

Renzi and Crain are not currently considering legal action, but in 2012 Johnson & Johnson settled lawsuits with 845 plaintiffs who claimed they were not properly warned about the risks.

http://www.click2houston.com/news/more-than-2000-adverse-reactions-reported-from-common-prescription-medications/32350128