Showing posts with label Be. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Be. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 April 2017

St Johns Wort For Neuropathy Be Careful!


Today's post from google.com (see link below) looks at the benefits of Hypericum (St. John's Wort) extracts for neuropathic pain. It may be effective for some people living with neuropathy but it could be extremely dangerous for HIV patients with neuropathy. Unfortunately, St. John's Wort can directly interfere with the working of some HIV medications and although it's calming effects may be tempting, it's very important that you discuss it with your HIV specialist before you think about taking it. St. John's Wort has been used since the Middle Ages for forms of depression and insomnia but however attractive it may seem for any of your problems, you really should take expert advice.



Use of hypericum perforatum extracts in the treatment of neuropathic pain
EP 2247296 A1 (text from WO2009106263A1)

Publication numberEP2247296 A1
Publication typeApplication
Publication date10 Nov 2010
Filing date19 Feb 2009
Priority date27 Feb 2008
Also published as
US20110008473
US20110218249
Inventors
Rita Anna Bilia
4 More »
Applicant
Aboca S.p.A. Societa' Agricola
International Classification
A61P 25/00
2 More »
European Classification
A61K 36/38
External LinksEspacenet
EP Register

ABSTRACT


Disclosed is the use of hypericum (Hypericum perforatum L.) tip extracts containing hypericin, of hypericin, to prepare medicinal products and/or food supplements for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
CLAIMS (OCR text may contain errors)


CLAIMS

1. The use of hypericum {Hypericum perforatum L.) flowering stems extracts containing hypericin, or hypericin, for the preparation of medicaments and/or food supplements for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

2. The use as claimed in claim 1, wherein the neuropathic pain is caused by treatment with chemotherapy drugs.

3. The use as claimed in claim 2, wherein the chemotherapy drugs are platinum complexes, vincristine and paclitaxel. 4. The use as claimed in claim 1, wherein the neuropathic pain derives from sciatic pain.

5. The use as claimed in claim 1, wherein the neuropathic pain derives from osteoarthritis.

6. The use as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 of hypericum extracts with a naphthodianthrone derivative (hypericin and pseudohypericin) content of not less than 0.25%.

7. The use of a freeze-dried extract as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5.

8. The use as claimed in claim 7, wherein the extract is a water-alcohol or water-acetone extract.
DESCRIPTION (OCR text may contain errors)


USE OF HYPERICUM PERFORATUM EXTRACTS IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROPATHIC PAIN

The present invention relates to the use of extracts of hypericum

{Hypericum perforatum L.) flowering stems and the components thereof for the preparation of pharmaceutical preparations and/or food supplements for the treatment of various forms of neuropathic pain (caused by chemotherapy drugs, mononeuropathy or osteoarthritis).

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

Pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage ". Within this definition a particular type of pain associated with neurological abnormalities, called neuropathic pain, is becoming increasingly important due to its significant, growing worldwide prevalence. Neuropathic pain is defined as "pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system", which may take the form of dysaesthesia, allodynia, hyperpathy, stinging or stabbing pain.

Neuropathic pain is distinguished from other types of commonly reported (nociceptive) pain, including headache, backache, and other types of musculoskeletal pain, and comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions which cannot be explained by a single etiology or a particular anatomical lesion.

These disorders of the structures of the central or peripheral nervous system include various neuropathies (diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuropathy, inflammatory neuropathies, neuropathy caused by alcohol abuse and neuropathy associated with HIV/AIDS infection), and can derive from various toxins (such as neurotoxins), acute trauma (including surgical traumas), chronic trauma (such as repetitive stress syndrome), mononeuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (the most common type of mononeuropathy, which affects 2.8% to 4.6% of the adult population), and disorders of the central nervous system (such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, cerebral ischaemia, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord lesions and head injuries).

The disorder is not easy to diagnose, because although the nerve produces continual painful discharges, it is often anatomically intact.

Neuropathic pain covers a variety of pathological states and presents with a variety of symptoms, which have the following common denominators: • pain is perceived in the absence of a permanent, identifiable tissue lesion or process;

• unpleasant, abnormal or unusual sensations (dysaesthesia) are present, frequently described as stinging or electric shocks;

• brief episodes of paroxystic stabbing or piercing pain are present; • the pain appears some time after the lesion that triggered it;

• the pain is perceived in a region with a sensory deficit;

• even mild stimuli are painful (allodynia);

• marked summation and persistent activity occur after the application of repeated stimuli. It is estimated that neuropathic pain affects up to 3% of the population, and that some 1 to 5% of European adults suffer from chronic pain.

According to the literature, in the USA the problem of neuropathic pain is potentially onerous for the national insurance systems, with a prevalence of 1.5%. 80% of patients with tumours at an advanced stage present neuropathic symptoms.

Chronic neuropathic pain is a major problem in neurology because it is frequent and often disabling, due to its unpleasant, chronic nature. It is also a type of pain which does not respond well to the most common analgesics, such as acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol or the most common non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs.

The aim of pharmacological treatments should be to prevent pain, but in practice, the most that can be achieved is to reduce the pain to a bearable level.

At present, no class of drugs has proved universally effective for patients with neuropathic pain.

"Off-label" drugs belonging to the following categories are generally used, but cause serious side effects in the long term:

- antidepressants

- anticonvulsants (gabapentin)

- opioids (methadone, oxycodone)

- tramadol - lidocaine

- cytokine-inhibiting antiinflammatories.

When these drugs are effective, they reduce pain by 25-40% in 40-60% of patients.

Moreover, numerous adverse effects are caused by continuous use of these drugs.

Neuropathic pain therefore represents a major clinical challenge due to its severity, chronic nature, resistance to the usual treatments and serious effect on the quality of the life.

The main research into this disorder uses experimental metabolic, pharmacological or trauma models in rodents, which reproduce the characteristics of human pain symptoms (Ref 1-7).

Hypericum, also known as St. John's Wort, consists of the flowering stems of Hypericum perforatum. It contains a large number of different classes of substances: naphthodianthrone derivatives such as hypericin, pseudohypericin and isohypericin, and phloroglucinol derivatives such as hyperforin. It also contains flavonoids such as hyperoside, rutin, 13,118-biapigenin, quercetin, quercitrin and isoquercitrin, procyanidins, essential oil and xanthones.

It is widely used in modern phytotherapy to treat some forms of mild or moderate depression and psychovegetative problems, with effective results at the dose of 500-1050 mg of extract/day divided into 2-3 doses, for 2-4 weeks, and fewer side effects than treatment with synthetic antidepressants. Hypericum perforatum extracts have been tested in many experimental pharmacological and clinical trials, which fully support its use for depression, but many questions about its characteristics still remain unanswered. A number of action mechanisms have been suggested to explain its antidepressant effects: 1) non-selective serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibition; 2) increased density of the serotoninergic, dopaminergic and GABA receptors; 3) increased affinity for the GABA receptors; 4) inhibition of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO). The identity of the active components is still in doubt, and its pharmacological activity seems to be complex and determined by the concomitant effects of a number of active substances. Hypericin has been identified as "the" active ingredient, but a new component, hyperforin, which was recently identified, seems to play an important part in the efficacy of the plant, while flavonoids, in particular rutin, have been identified as compounds which can influence its activity (Ref. 8- 15). A clinical trial (16) published in 2000 describes the inefficacy of a hypericum extract in the treatment of neuropathies.

Other studies describe the analgesic activity of hypericum, but they were conducted on different species from Hypericum perforatum, the extracts were not chemically characterised, the administration route was often not oral, and above all, they were evaluated on non-neuropathic pain models (hot plate test, writhing test, Ref. 16-22).

http://www.google.com/patents/EP2247296A1?cl=en&dq=hiv+neuropathy+january+2012&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MiD9UJehKOfB0QWQjYHgDA&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ

Monday, 13 February 2017

Will Generic Pregablin Lyrica Be Any Better For Neuropathy Patients


Today's post from psnc.org.uk (see link below) is a British view and advice to pharmacists on the changing status of Lyrica, as Pfizer's patent has now run out and generic versions will be coming onto the market. Pfizer in their wisdom, have decided to maintain a Lyrica patent for patients with neuropathy, at least until July 2017. This will effectively prevent other companies from bringing out a generic version until that date. Now in 2013, Pfizer were quite clear that pregabalin (Lyrica) was in their own eyes unsuitable for diabetes and HIV-related neuropathy patients. This was mainly due to adverse study outcomes and many court cases relating to side effect issues. The point is: what's changed? the answer: probably nothing: they still won't approve Lyrica for HIV and diabetes neuropathy patients and the FDA backs that up completely. So is this just a corporate move to prevent rivals from bringing generic Lyrica to the market too quickly? More importantly for neuropathy patients; will generic pregabalin (lyrica) be any more effective and any less dangerous for patients in the future. We'll have to wait and follow the recommendations for the US FDA and similar authorities across the world but until then, if your doctor is still prescribing Pregabalin (Lyrica) (generic or not) for your neuropathic problems, you need to have a serious discussion as to whether this is in fact, the best option.

Pregabalin (Lyrica) – Licensing differences between Lyrica and Generic
January 29, 2015

Pregabalin (Lyrica) patent is changing and generic pregabalin is becoming available. The NPA have issued advice (shown below) regarding the licencing of the products.

The NPA have also informed us that are also in the process of discussing this issue with the MHRA and Pfizer.

Dear Pharmacist

You may find in the coming months that generic pregabalin is available to order. I would like to highlight to you that although the patent for pregabalin expired in July 2014, this patent expiry related to the use of pregabalin in epilepsy and generalised anxiety disorder; Pfizer will retain a patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral and central neuropathic pain in adults until July 2017.
This means that until July 2017, generic manufacturers of pregabalin will only be able to obtain a licence for pregabalin for use in epilepsy and/or generalised anxiety disorder and Lyrica, Pfizer’s branded product, will remain the only product licensed for use in pain as well as epilepsy and generalised anxiety disorder.

Pfizer has indicated that it will contest any challenges to the patent for pain.

To avoid any possible patent infringement by pharmacists, steps will need to be taken to ensure that where generic pregablin is requested on a prescription the correctly licensed product is supplied. This may mean contacting the prescriber and establishing the indication and requesting that the prescription is amended and ordered by brand as Lyrica if necessary.

Although generic pregabalin is unlikely to differ clinically from the branded Lyrica, supplying the generic version of pregabalin for neuropathic pain may have the following implications for pharmacists:
Generic pregabalin preparations will not include information relating to neuropathic pain in the patient information leaflet and pharmacists will be supplying a product off-licence
Supplying generic pregabalin for neuropathic pain would not be in line with Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency’s risk hierarchy guidance for the supply of unlicensed medicinal products, which states that a UK-licensed product should always be supplied for the correct licensed indication
Using generic pregabalin for neuropathic pain may be deemed by Pfizer to be a patent infringement by all parties concerned, including the prescriber and the supplying pharmacist

Currently, reimbursement for NHS prescriptions for pregabalin is based on Lyrica. This may change when generic versions become available meaning that pharmacists may not be correctly reimbursed where Lyrica is supplied against a generically written prescription for pregabalin. I advise that where generic prescriptions for pregabalin are received, the prescriber is contacted to ascertain the indication. Where the indication is for neuropathic pain, the prescription should be returned to the prescriber for amendment to Lyrica. Prescriptions for pregabilin for epilepsy or generalised anxiety disorder can be dispensed with either Lyrica or appropriately licensed generic versions.

When supplying pregabalin for the treatment of epilepsy, pharmacists should also consider MHRA guidance issued in 2013 regarding the generic prescribing of antiepileptics. The guidance states that pregabalin does not generally need to be prescribed by brand for the treatment of epilepsy unless there are specific concerns such as patient anxiety and a risk of confusion or dosing errors.

For further information on this or any other query please contact the NPA Pharmacy Services Team on 01727 891 800 / 08447 364 201
or email pharmacyservices@npa.co.uk .

http://psnc.org.uk/sunderland-lpc/our-news/pregabalin-lyrica-licensing-differences-bewteen-lyrica-and-generic/